tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9611352.post113692473013326221..comments2024-02-19T19:53:01.688-08:00Comments on Cathode Tan: God's DebrisJoshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04260309971152360156noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9611352.post-1136928478701688572006-01-10T13:27:00.000-08:002006-01-10T13:27:00.000-08:00Fair enough, though from some of the snippets of t...Fair enough, though from some of the snippets of the book it's not too surprising since Adams takes what could be a considered a decidedly Christian view of God and the Universe.<BR/><BR/>And honestly, ID as someone's personal explanation of tying their God to scientific constructs as actually OK with me. I have a problem with ID when the religious start acting blankly when people start pointing out that for their argument, God does actually have to be in the room. <BR/><BR/>In other words, if someone wants to believe in Creationism ... that's their thing. Just don't expect me to accept it as science because it's got a different name.<BR/><BR/>Scott's own words on ID, btw:<BR/><BR/>http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2005/11/intelligent_des.htmlJoshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04260309971152360156noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9611352.post-1136926745296847272006-01-10T12:59:00.000-08:002006-01-10T12:59:00.000-08:00Not to say that this means anything regarding his ...Not to say that this means anything regarding his other published works, but Adams is also one of those crazy <A HREF="http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/scott_adams_is_a_wally/" REL="nofollow">Intelligent Design kids</A>. I'm not real likely to read his thought experiments, self-hynotized or not.Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08947215225025651626noreply@blogger.com